'New study offers hope for species ‘too rare to save''

Talk about nature and wildlife you've seen or read about. Discuss specific plants, animals, natural places and wildlife in general, or follow the instructions in the Nature & Wildlife Photography forum to submit your own wildlife photographs.

Moderators: Isela, Koa

Post Reply
User avatar
Former User of the Month
Former User of the Month
Posts: 7589
Joined: Sun Oct 11, 2009 2:47 am
Gender: Female
Location: England, United Kingdom

'New study offers hope for species ‘too rare to save''

Post by Masika » Mon May 30, 2011 8:43 am

May 2011: A new study offers hope for species such as the Siberian tiger that might be considered ‘too rare to save', so long as conservation efforts can target key threats.

The findings have important implications for conserving some of the world's most endangered species, which often exist in populations far smaller than the many thousands of individuals that earlier studies had argued were necessary for viability.

Charismatic examples include the mountain gorilla, which likely now number 1,000 or less, the approximately 450 remaining Amur or Siberian tigers, the 180-500 remaining mature Philippine eagles and the 70 wild Puerto Rican parrots.

There is no catch-all guideline

The findings of a UK-US research team, the largest critical review of the use of minimum viable population (MVP) numbers in conservation, dispute the use of a universal MVP as a yardstick for conservation policies. According to the researchers there is no single population size that can be used as a catch-all guideline to save endangered species.

Co-author of the report Dr Philip Stephens, of Durham University, said: ‘Populations usually show rapid declines as a result of human activities such as hunting and habitat conversion. The results of the study are encouraging and show that if we can remove the negative effects of human activities, even relatively small populations could be viable in the long term.'

This is good news
Dr Greg Hayward, the US Forest Service's (USFS) regional ecologist for Alaska said: ‘This is good news for biologists working to save species such as the tiger. There's a lot of work to do to arrest the effects of poaching, prey loss and habitat destruction. However, if that work is successful, the tiger might yet be able to recover, despite the relatively small size of most tiger populations.'

The study shows that population sizes required for long-term viability vary, both within and among species, and depend on the specific circumstances in which the population is found. Estimates of viable population sizes were typically reduced to hundreds rather than thousands of individuals for populations that were relatively stable.

Previous studies have suggested that the allocation of conservation effort should be related to the number of individuals in threatened populations. For species which would require intense effort to raise numbers to 5,000 individuals, it might be too late to act and better to concentrate limited conservation resources elsewhere, the previous studies have suggested.

Don't give up
Researchers on the US-UK team argue that conservationists should not give up on saving an endangered species if its population is below an MVP figure, and they advise policy-makers to be cautious about setting guidelines for ‘safe' population sizes.

The researchers also warn against potential complacency and stress the need to look in detail at the specific threats that a species faces. They argue that no population size is likely to be safe from extinction when conservation activities fail to reduce the impact of the factors causing the population to decline.

Dr Curt Flather, a research ecologist with the USFS Rocky Mountain Research Station in Colorado said: ‘The enormous variability in estimates shows that many populations also need to be highly abundant to be viable. The extinction of the passenger pigeon, which numbered three to five billion individuals in North America during the 1800s, is a reminder that population size alone is no guarantee against extinction.'

Steve Beissinger, a Professor at the University of California, Berkeley, emphasised the need to go beyond established guidelines in determining whether a species is endangered. ‘Viability depends on the idiosyncrasies of the factors causing a species to decline, and there is no single population size that guarantees safety for all species. There's more that matters than just size.'
Source: http://www.wildlifeextra.com/go/news/co ... ction.html
Icon (c) coyoteflu

User avatar
-- Silhouette --
Newborn Wolf
Newborn Wolf
Posts: 7
Joined: Fri May 27, 2011 5:48 pm

Re: 'New study offers hope for species ‘too rare to save''

Post by -- Silhouette -- » Tue May 31, 2011 7:17 pm

This is lovely news! Hopefully by the time i have children Sibe Tigers will still be around :3 i'd love for my own to be able to see those beautiful cats.

xx Athalie
......... αтнαʟɪє

User avatar
Posts: 75
Joined: Mon Jun 27, 2011 7:19 pm
Gender: Female

Re: 'New study offers hope for species ‘too rare to save''

Post by Mayachi » Tue Jun 28, 2011 5:37 pm

This is great news! I hate to see so many species becoming extinct. At least this adds new hope!
♦And it's obvious that your dying, dying.♦
♦Just living proof that the camera's lying.♦
♦And oh oh open wide, 'cause this is your night.♦
♦So smile, 'cause you'll go out in style.♦
♦You'll go out in style.♦

Avatar (c) Mayachi

User avatar
Alpha Female
Former WQ Moderator
Posts: 6112
Joined: Wed Dec 31, 1969 6:00 pm
Name: Kali
Gender: Female
Location: Living the dream

Re: 'New study offers hope for species ‘too rare to save''

Post by Alpha Female » Tue Jun 28, 2011 6:16 pm

This is definitely amazing news! I'm very glad to see that there are efforts being made to help save these great cats. Thanks for sharing Silver! ^^

Avatar (c) April
~WolfQuest member since 1969~

User avatar
Posts: 90
Joined: Sat Mar 19, 2011 4:40 pm
Gender: Male
Location: Quick look behind you!

Re: 'New study offers hope for species ‘too rare to save''

Post by lightshadowwolf223 » Tue Dec 13, 2011 4:08 pm

Im glad to hear that! and also I forgot were i heard this but a scientist in Japan claims he is going to try to start cloning endangered animals, i know very well this is possable but i don't know how well it will work like if any side-effects will occur.
Hunting is not destruction and i get annoyed by people all ways going like: OOO your killing the animals!
I just say: No. its population managment, and could someone who hates animals know so much about them?


Re: 'New study offers hope for species ‘too rare to save''

Post by gabrilagg » Wed Jan 25, 2012 9:52 am

Thanks for sharing this! Wonderful news, now maybe we can prevent losing species also like Brazilian jaguars, and many other species. I'm happy there still are hopes to believe c:

User avatar
Posts: 426
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2011 1:38 pm
Gender: Female

Re: 'New study offers hope for species ‘too rare to save''

Post by brightstar99 » Thu Jan 26, 2012 11:49 am

Thank you for sharing this silverhybrid! I hope that the endangered species will recover from the danger they face before such as poachers, forest lost and from traps that can kill them. I always want to see these beautiful big cats.
avatar by yuli .

Post Reply

Return to “Nature & Wildlife”